WinLoG transportation investigation QA/QC log for BH-05 TRANS-QAQC

BH-05 Transportation Investigation Log

Transportation log Validation Report

TRANSPORTATION VALIDATION EXAMPLE

WinLoG Transportation QA/QC Example

DOT-focused QA/QC for pavement, subgrade, sampling, and laboratory data.

This example shows how WinLoG applies automated QA/QC to a transportation investigation for Highway 7 Eastbound at Station 12+450. BH-05 TRANS-QAQC combines pavement and granular-base descriptions, native subgrade, sampling, SPT N-values, recovery, USCS/AASHTO classification, groundwater, moisture, optimum moisture, CBR, and sieve results in one agency-oriented log.

The borehole intentionally contains selected data-quality issues so WinLoG can demonstrate traceability errors and transportation engineering review conditions. The validation demonstrates both general sample QA/QC and transportation-specific rules for wet or weak subgrade.

Transportation SPT USCS AASHTO CBR Sieve Results Groundwater Automated Validation XML Template

Download Complete Example Back to Example Library

Capabilities Demonstrated

What This Transportation Example Shows

Transportation Profile

Route and station identification
Asphalt pavement
Granular A and B materials
Native subgrade
Soil and till stratigraphy
Groundwater observation

Field Testing

SPT N-values
Sample recovery
Bulk and split-spoon samples
Sample recovery
USCS and AASHTO classifications
Sample ID traceability
Depth-linked field records

Laboratory Data

Natural moisture content
Optimum moisture content
California Bearing Ratio
Percent passing No. 200 sieve
Sieve percent passing
Depth-matched test results

Validation

R-730 missing sample ID
R-731 duplicate sample ID
R-801 moisture versus optimum
R-802 CBR versus criterion
Depth-specific findings
Validation report and guidance

How the Example Demonstrates Transportation QA/QC

The example contains deliberate data-quality exceptions rather than only idealized data. One sample identifier is missing, another is duplicated, the native subgrade moisture is materially above optimum, and the measured CBR is below the example design criterion.

The sample XML is configured with 2 errors and 2 warnings so the borehole log and validation report demonstrate how WinLoG identifies, documents, and communicates conditions requiring correction or engineering review.

Example Findings

Selected QA/QC Conditions Demonstrated

Transportation Material Checks

Subgrade moisture of 22.6% compared with 17.5% optimum
Two-percentage-point moisture tolerance
CBR of 3% compared with a 5% minimum criterion
USCS/AASHTO classification alongside test results
Sieve and No. 200 passing data displayed with depth

Traceability & Review Checks

Missing sample ID error at 6.30 m
Duplicate sample ID error at 4.80 m
Wet-subgrade warning at 2.20 m
Low-CBR warning at 2.20 m
72% completeness and 54% confidence indicators

Download the Complete Example

Download the example files individually. The XML template and log can be imported into WinLoG Version 6 and customized for company-specific transportation workflows.

Borehole Log PDF Validation Report XML Template XML Log

Included in the Example

Professional transportation investigation log
Transportation validation report
Reusable XML template
BH-05 TRANS-QAQC XML borehole data
Deliberate errors and warnings for training and demonstration

Applications

Who This Example Is For

Transportation Consultants

Demonstrates an integrated roadway boring workflow with pavement, granular materials, subgrade, sampling, laboratory results, and automated QA/QC.

DOT & Transportation Agencies

Shows how agency-oriented logs can consistently document route, station, pavement, subgrade, CBR, moisture, classification, and sieve information.

Design & QA/QC Reviewers

Shows how field and laboratory information can be checked together before transportation records support pavement design, review, approval, or issue.

Learn More in the Knowledge Center

SPT and N-Value QA/QC Procedures

Geotechnical QA/QC for Infrastructure Projects

Borehole Data Governance for Transportation Projects

Automated QA/QC Rules for Borehole Validation

Cross-Dataset Validation in Geotechnical Databases

Why Structured Data Improves Borehole QA/QC

Related Examples

Continue Exploring WinLoG

Validation & QA/QC Showcase

Geotechnical QA/QC

Environmental QA/QC

Rock Core Investigation

Customize This Transportation Example for Your Organization

WinLoG templates can be customized to match company standards, project requirements, and agency formats. Validation rules can also be tailored to company QA/QC procedures, client requirements, and future agency-specific rule libraries.

Contact GAEA Technologies