POLLUTEv10 vs MIGRATEv10 Examples

Matched POLLUTEv10 and MIGRATEv10 pure diffusion concentration profiles
Five Matched Comparison Cases

See When POLLUTEv10 and MIGRATEv10 Agree—and Why They Differ

Begin with matched diffusion and advection cases, then examine finite sources, hydraulic trapping and fractured media with sorption.

Each comparison uses equivalent physical conditions to separate transport behavior from the effect of dimensionality: POLLUTE’s 1D/1.5D formulation and MIGRATE’s explicit 2D representation.

5 ComparisonsMatched model conditions
1D/1.5D vs 2DDimensional effects isolated
Transport ProgressionDiffusion through fractures
Selection GuidanceScreening or spatial detail
Comparison Library

Progress from Agreement to Spatial Complexity

Start with pure diffusion to verify the common physics, then add flow, source depletion, opposing gradients and fractured transport.

Showing 5 comparisons

POLLUTEv10 versus MIGRATEv10 comparison: Pure Diffusion Comparison
Matched VerificationModel agreement

Pure Diffusion Comparison

Uses identical 4 m diffusion-only models to verify close agreement when lateral spreading does not affect the solution.

Open documented comparison
POLLUTEv10 versus MIGRATEv10 comparison: Advective–Diffusive Transport Comparison
Matched VerificationAdvection and diffusion

Advective–Diffusive Transport Comparison

Adds downward velocity and aquifer outflow, producing rapid breakthrough and closely matching centerline profiles.

Open documented comparison
POLLUTEv10 versus MIGRATEv10 comparison: Finite Mass Source Comparison
Finite Sources & FlowFinite mass

Finite Mass Source Comparison

Compares peak timing and magnitude as a limited source depletes and MIGRATE distributes mass laterally.

Open documented comparison
POLLUTEv10 versus MIGRATEv10 comparison: Hydraulic Trap with a Finite Mass Source
Finite Sources & FlowHydraulic trap

Hydraulic Trap with a Finite Mass Source

Examines upward flow opposing downward migration and changing the breakthrough response in both formulations.

Open documented comparison
POLLUTEv10 versus MIGRATEv10 comparison: Fractured Layer with Sorption
Fractured MediaFractured media

Fractured Layer with Sorption

Combines fracture flow, matrix diffusion and sorption to show agreement in upper layers and spatial variability at depth.

Open documented comparison
Instructional examples are not design standards. Adapt the conceptual model and parameters to site-specific conditions and have the resulting engineering interpretation reviewed by a qualified professional.
Suggested Comparison Path

Separate Common Physics from Dimensional Effects

1

Verify Diffusion

Use Pure Diffusion to confirm that the matched models produce nearly identical profiles under simple conditions.

2

Add Groundwater Flow

Use Advective–Diffusive Transport to compare rapid breakthrough and centerline agreement.

3

Change Source Behavior

Compare Finite Mass and Hydraulic Trap cases to examine peaks, depletion and opposing flow.

4

Resolve Spatial Complexity

Use the Fractured Layer case to see how MIGRATE reveals lateral variability hidden by a 1D average.

Interpreting Differences

A Different Result Does Not Automatically Mean a Wrong Result

  • Confirm both models use equivalent geometry, properties, sources and boundaries
  • Compare the same time, depth and centerline or averaging location
  • Expect close agreement where lateral spreading is not influential
  • Expect different peak magnitudes when MIGRATE distributes mass laterally
  • Use mass behavior and spatial profiles to explain—not hide—the difference
  • Select the simplest formulation that remains defensible for the decision

Practical Product Selection

  1. Use POLLUTE for efficient layered screening.
  2. Use POLLUTE for conservative 1D/1.5D estimates.
  3. Use MIGRATE when source width and position matter.
  4. Use MIGRATE for multiple interacting sources.
  5. Use MIGRATE to inspect lateral plume structure.
  6. Document why the selected dimension fits the question.
Continue Learning

Connect the Comparisons to Each Product

POLLUTEv10 Core Features

Review the layered 1D/1.5D formulation, sources, boundaries and engineering outputs.

Explore POLLUTE Features

MIGRATEv10 Core Features

Review two-dimensional geometry, multiple sources, fractured media and spatial results.

Explore MIGRATE Features

Complete Comparison Archive

Open the original articles with detailed parameters, tables, plots and interpretation.

Open the archive

POLLUTEv10 Examples

Explore 20 progressive layered contaminant-transport examples.

Browse POLLUTE Examples

MIGRATEv10 Examples

Explore 13 progressive two-dimensional contaminant-transport examples.

Browse MIGRATE Examples

Technical Support

Ask about formulation selection, model configuration or product evaluation.

Contact Technical Support

Ready to Compare the Models?

Reproduce a matched case, verify the common physics and then decide whether the project requires conservative layered screening or explicit spatial behavior.